NSTA Legislative Update
August 13, 2007
Update
on No Child Left Behind
On July 30, Representative George Miller (D-CA), Chair of the Education and Labor Committee, delivered a speech at the National Press Club on the upcoming reauthorization timetable of the No Child Left Behind Act. Miller stressed throughout his remarks that No Child Left Behind has produced positive outcomes for students, teachers, and families across the country. He reiterated the cornerstone goals of rigorous standards and accountability for academic achievement of all students and gave assurance these points will be retained in the revised legislation.
Miller also noted, however,
that he and Members of the Education and Labor Committee have heard very loudly
and clearly that changes are needed to fix the unintended consequences of the
law, help more students reach proficiency in math and reading, and close the
achievement gap. According to Miller, the statute didn’t get it all right,
and currently the law is “not fair, not flexible, and not funded.”
To that end, Miller highlighted six features on which the Committee will focus
during reauthorization. These are fairness and flexibility for schools, a rich
and challenging curriculum, support for teachers and principals, school accountability,
steps to turn around low-performing middle and high schools, and greater investments
to achieve the law's goals.
In terms of specifics, the Chairman stressed his desire to provide schools with
more fairness and flexibility in measuring students’ growth and guard
against a narrowing of the curriculum. He expressed his belief that, while schools
need to remain accountable to all students, the new bill should allow for multiple
assessment measures and include a growth model that builds upon the program
currently being piloted by the U.S. Department of Education.
Second, a rich and challenging learning environment for all students that includes
a rigorous curriculum preparing students for postsecondary education and the
21st century global workforce is critical. Miller talked about providing states
with incentives to work with the corporate and higher education sectors to develop
curricula that meet these challenges.
Third, more support for teachers and principals is needed to ensure quality
and help close the achievement gap. Miller stressed the importance of school
leadership. Support will be provided to help LEAs train, hire, and retain more
teachers with the goal of building a larger cadre of highly qualified teacher
professionals. He also stated that performance pay options based on fairness
and effectiveness, as well as career ladders and mentoring options, would be
included in the bill. When asked a follow-up question by a reporter regarding
the details of this option, Miller emphasized that while he supported some portion
of performance pay being tied to student achievement, he also supports all collective
bargaining agreements. He further stated that while performance pay models for
teachers would not spread nationwide overnight, many successful ones have been
initiated. Miller believes these models reflect what is needed to attract the
next generation of teachers. Like all other professionals, they need to be rewarded
for extra efforts put forth that produce superior results. They also want options
such as career ladders, extensive professional development, and compensation
for their expertise and dedication.
Fourth, schools must remain accountable for students’ progress, including
that of minority and low-income students, students learning English, and those
with disabilities. Under current law, schools whose students have not made adequate
yearly progress are all treated the same in terms of interventions, sanctions,
and timing. Miller stated that “We need to distinguish among different
schools and the challenges facing them, as well as their needs for addressing
those challenges.” Therefore, support needs to be provided to schools
in most need of help.
Fifth, steps to turn around low-performing middle and high schools will be included
in the new legislation. Addressing the nation’s drop-out rate is imperative,
and comprehensive steps to address the most troubled, lowest-performing high
schools is critical for overall student success. Miller also stated that the
bill will include uniform standards for measuring graduation rates that are
fair, accurate, reliable, and will do more to keep students in school.
And finally, greater and sustained investments to achieve the law's goals will
be needed. Miller pointed out that the new Democratic Congress has begun this
effort – first with the continuing resolution for FY 2007, and then in
the FY 2008 appropriations bill, the Innovation and Competitiveness Agenda,
and the College Cost Reduction Act. If the Chairman had it his way, he would
support a “supplemental spending measure” just focused on increased
investment in education to make up for the past five years of reduced spending
levels.
Miller stressed his intention to pass a bill in September, both in Committee
and on the House floor. He reminded the audience that the bill will reflect
the input of Members from both parties and the testimony from nearly two dozen
Congressional hearings. Miller also stated that in addition to communicating
with Secretary Spellings and her staff that “Congressman McKeon and I
have been working together on this reauthorization for many months. He has been
very helpful to this process.” Interestingly, Ranking Member McKeon issued
a statement immediately following Miller’s speech that stated, “Republicans
began laying the foundation for NCLB’s reauthorization more than a year
ago by kicking off a slate of bipartisan hearings on topics most important to
the law’s future. More than halfway through 2007, I am disappointed with
the pace of negotiations and hopeful that we can reach an agreement soon.”
At the conclusion of Miller’s remarks, many thoughtful questions were
asked about multiple assessment measures, the timetable, performance pay, the
cost of the bill, and better assessments for limited English–proficient
students. In response to a question about school choice, Miller said the issue
was still under “considerable discussion” but that he certainly
supported the Department’s allowance of schools opting for supplemental
education services (SES) before choice. The most important question, according
to Miller, is what is this investment in SES really buying for students and
schools?
Click here to read the speech in its entirety. View
Representative McKeon’s response here.
Representative Ehlers Introduces Bill to Strengthen the Department of Education Math and Science Partnerships
Representative Vernon Ehlers introduced the Improving Math and Science Teacher Quality Act, a bill to strengthen the Math and Science Partnerships program. Read more in the attached fact sheet distributed by his office.
For more information, please
contact jpeterson@nsta.org.